Intensity – Older Machines and How they Compare

The “modern” Rife developers which included Dr Peter Williams, and Dr Susan James, who limited the output due to Sensitivity issues when the machine was developed in 2006. Trials were showing outstanding results with lower intensity output combined with the longest periods of treatments. Also the Sweep commands would keep switching frequencies continuously over this extended time which made an impact on the pathogens faster than single frequency broadcast. Supersweep also pushed the boundaries with broad spectrum frequency treatments. Also the CAFL (2006) Frequencies were trialed and found to be inadequate and inaccurate. Too much focus in the tiny HZ spectrum’s, which did not follow the Bioresonance data, which showed that effective frequency treatments needed a much larger variation in Hz output. So the EFTDFL replaced the CAFL in 2006, and was based on years of research combining around 20 SCIO Bioresonance Clinics, which provided the Bioresonance Data received from frequency treatments on patients around the world. Re: Plasma tubes. Many of the powerful Rife Machines using Plasma are broadcasting in the human spectrum, which according to Dr Williams has adverse affects on the human body. Our competitors constantly ridicule us for not using frequencies which are in the “danger to human” levels 2000-6000 Khz. however we are not in the business of making “frequency weapons” (yes US military have a Frequency Weapon using these higher frequencies), rather we follow the Bioresonance methods which rarely show usable frequencies over 1000Khz. Gold Fish are in the 2000Khz spectrum, operating a Plasma tube over 1500Khz will kill fish, and also potentially harm humans.  

Link to the Healthproducts2 Home:
DISCLAIMER

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top