An extra 3 frequencies were added due to the importance of each 13 listed frequencies. Pulmonary Fibrosis:0.65, 0.41, 0.62, 4.97, 7.50, 15.31, 87.50, 325.93, 385.90, 504.37, 651.63, 764.89, 912.50 (you will run 10 frequencies – and then the additional 3) Run the following set for 1 week: A. Pulmonary Fibrosis: 0.65, 0.41, 4.97, 7.50, 15.31, […]
Pulmonary Fibrosis – New information for frequencies Read More »
ETDFL 2020/21 is a major update to the 2017 version. The ETDFL 2020 Uses 3-4 pages of the forward outlining the many many updates. Due to better Bioresonance equipment, and a larger group (source) of Data; many frequencies which had single decimal places now have expanded to 2 decimals. Some of the older 2006 CAFL
Frequency Sets – Same Condition, Different Set, Why? Read More »
Using different sets can have surprising results. There is no reason why a Fungus set should produce symptoms, where another set will have no apparent effect. The frequencies were analysed using Bioresonance machines. If the Bioresonance machine detects frequency A, B and C is killing off human fungus genotypes then those sets will actually simulate
Can I Use 2 Different Frequency Sets? Read More »
ETDFL 2020/21 is a major update to the 2017 version. The ETDFL 2020 Uses 3-4 pages of the forward outlining the many many updates. Due to better Bioresonance equipment, and a larger group (source) of Data; many frequencies which had single decimal places now have expanded to 2 decimals. Some of the older 2006 CAFL
ETDFL — Updating Process Read More »
Question: I see a Herpes set from my 2017 frequency manual is different from what is in my new 2021 manual that came with my new machine upgrade. Can you tell me why that is, and which set should I use? Answer: ETDFL 2020/21 is a major update to the 2017 version. The ETDFL 2020
2 Different Frequency Sets for the Same Condition? Read More »
Question: I was delivering the Rife machines and I noticed that the codes for Herpes Simplex II are different within the older manual [for the V2] than for the Newest manual for V3. Also, the codes for SIBOS are also different. Have the codes themselves been updated or is it that the newest machines need
New Frequencies vs Older Frequencies Read More »
Question: Hi Michele! Thank you so much for clarification, as I had no idea what Group 8 means and didn’t know its good for me, thank you very much for this info! Also, I speak Russian and checked the list of frequencies for rectal and to my surprise numbers do not match. For example, Squamous
Frequency Translations Read More »
Question: When there are 2 different sets for the same condition, what do I use? I have a set from the 2017 ETDFL and one from the 2020 ETDFL, same condition, but the sets are different. Answer: The ETDFL 2020 Uses 3-4 pages of the forward outlining the many many updates. Due to better Bioresonance
Which frequency set do I use? Read More »
Frequencies that are true 20 years ago shift in time as more research is done, or pathogens evolve. The majority of Parasite frequencies have been upgraded, either to a small degree, or larger, and may not reflect exact sets from Dr Clarks original dated material. Some parasite frequencies have only minor Hz Adjustments. It is
Do Frequencies Evolve? Read More »
The original Gangrene frequency set was derived from CAFL 2006 set, which have been translated to all ETDFL sets each year until 2017. Between 2017 – 2020 a larger database of frequencies were compiled using raw data from clinics using Electrofrequency Devices, and Bioresonance machines, and this set was part of this major update. The