There are some customers who are still using the older versions of ETDFL. Some customers even use CAFL 2006 List. 2023 ETDFL Frequency List only corrects errors found in the earlier version(s) The most significant error in older editions is a medical condition listed under multiple different names, all having different frequency lists. Customers […]
ETDFL vs CAFL, New vs Old Read More »
Question: Breast Cancer 2 Frequency Sets, Which One Do We Use? Answer: This one is the new one for ETDL 2020 Cancer: Breast Specific 0.02, 0.46, 5.12, 27.50, 85.00, 95.75, 150.00 434.71, 682.45, 753.07 This one was carried forward from 2006 CAFL for relevance and customer requests Breast Cancer: 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 5.03, 119.34, 350,
Breast Cancer — 2 Frequency Sets, Which One Do We Use? Read More »
Looking back at previous ETDFL versions to 2006, it appears this group below is the latest (newest frequency set) Cancer: Melanoma: 0.35, 0.93, 7.5, 17.5, 52.5, 70, 215.7, 325.4, 434, 523.01 (ETDFL) Other CAFL sets which are included in the book have been left for relevance, and can be used in conjunction with the above
CAFL, is that set a mistake? Read More »
ETDFL 2020/21 is a major update to the 2017 version. The ETDFL 2020 Uses 3-4 pages of the forward outlining the many many updates. Due to better Bioresonance equipment, and a larger group (source) of Data; many frequencies which had single decimal places now have expanded to 2 decimals. Some of the older 2006 CAFL
ETDFL — Updating Process Read More »
Question: When there are 2 different sets for the same condition, what do I use? I have a set from the 2017 ETDFL and one from the 2020 ETDFL, same condition, but the sets are different. Answer: The ETDFL 2020 Uses 3-4 pages of the forward outlining the many many updates. Due to better Bioresonance
Which frequency set do I use? Read More »
How they determine the Frequencies The ETDFL team is all European. The main work is done in Berlin by (as far as I know) 9 people who work with Bioresonance machines. Each person owns a Bioresonance healing clinic or similar and treats hundreds of people per week for many different disease conditions. They work with
How They Find The Frequencies Read More »
Question: Do you sell Electrodermal Screening Devices? Answer: Presently we do not sell Electrodermal Screening Devices, and we also do not sell Bioresonance devices, (a similar diagnostic tool). ETDFL only use the Quantum SCIO Bioresonance machines to catalogue the frequencies applicable to various disease treatments. In fact SCIO has been extensively used since 2002 and
Electrodermal Screening Devices Read More »
Question: I have the Professional Rife Machine V2 and am a beginner of “Rifing”. I am interested in the treatment frequencies and have a question. Why are the frequencies in ETDFL different from those in CAFL? Why don’t you use CAFL? Answer: We don’t use CAFL as it expired in 2006 , 12 years ago
Why don’t you use the CAFL list? Read More »
The CAFL list stopped in 2006. The ETDFL list continues to be printed every year and updated accordingly. If older frequencies in the 2006 CAFL list were deemed unsuitable, or found not working effectively, they were replaced with ones that showed good results and in cancer patients this often eventuated in a remission process. Yes
ETDFL list vs the CAFL list Read More »
The higher frequencies are near 1 million Hz. In the frequency book are listed frequency sets against each disease condition. Generally they are listed from lowest range to higher ranges. The Higher range frequencies will be the ’10th frequency’ on each disease set listed. So there is not a general “Higher Range list”, rather a
About the Frequencies Read More »