Looking back at previous ETDFL versions to 2006, it appears this group below is the latest (newest frequency set) Cancer: Melanoma: 0.35, 0.93, 7.5, 17.5, 52.5, 70, 215.7, 325.4, 434, 523.01 (ETDFL) Other CAFL sets which are included in the book have been left for relevance, and can be used in conjunction with the above […]
CAFL, is that set a mistake? Read More »
Question: I have the Professional Rife Machine V2 and am a beginner of “Rifing”. I am interested in the treatment frequencies and have a question. Why are the frequencies in ETDFL different from those in CAFL? Why don’t you use CAFL? Answer: We don’t use CAFL as it expired in 2006 , 12 years ago
Why don’t you use the CAFL list? Read More »
The CAFL list stopped in 2006. The ETDFL list continues to be printed every year and updated accordingly. If older frequencies in the 2006 CAFL list were deemed unsuitable, or found not working effectively, they were replaced with ones that showed good results and in cancer patients this often eventuated in a remission process. Yes
ETDFL list vs the CAFL list Read More »
The CAFL list stopped in 2006. The ETDFL list continues to be printed every year and updated accordingly. If older frequencies in the 2006 CAFL list were deemed unsuitable, or found not working effectively, they were replaced with ones that showed good results and in cancer patients this often eventuated in a remission process. Yes
ETDFL list vs the CAFL list Read More »