Question:
I’m very curious as to why we enter ten frequency codes for a single bug such as E. Coli or S. pneumonia. I’m also curious about whether or not all species of Strep. or Staph. are in a particular frequency range or if their frequencies are scattered over a wide spectrum. If you know where I can get more info on the subject I would love a link.Thank you,
Answer:
Using 10 frequencies instead of just one allows for a comprehensive approach to treatment, addressing not just a single problem but potentially multiple issues concurrently. These frequencies are the result of over 10 years of bioresonance research, encompassing a wide array of conditions and contributing factors.
Dr. Hulda Clark pioneered frequency work with devices like Zappers, yet the full breadth of experience in utilizing multiple frequencies was achieved by Dr. Royal Rife with the Rife machine. Dr. Rife’s approach demonstrated the effectiveness of employing multiple frequencies for a more holistic treatment approach.
When it comes to conditions like Parkinson’s disease, where numerous factors may be at play, entering 10 frequency codes can target various aspects contributing to the disease’s development. Similarly, for single pathogens like E. Coli or S. pneumonia, multiple frequencies may be necessary due to the complexity of microbial interactions and potential variations in strains.
Regarding species of Strep. or Staph., their frequencies may not be confined to a specific range but rather scattered across a spectrum. This underscores the need for a broader approach when using multiple frequencies to address such pathogens effectively.
An intriguing development has emerged within the realm of frequency-based therapeutic literature, particularly concerning the Electronic Transmission Digital Frequency List (ETDFL). Notably, an author affiliated with ETDFL has conscientiously addressed the concerns of individuals who seek access to earlier editions of the Consolidated Annotated Frequency List (CAFL), a compilation that underwent several iterations until its transition into the ETDFL in 2006. This author’s contribution is marked by a meticulous categorization and incorporation of subject references spanning a wide array of diseases and disorders. Moreover, the inclusion of CAFL as a cross-reference enriches the comprehensiveness of this resource, catering to the diverse needs of readers.
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0BXN43P7K
While it is advisable for individuals to primarily utilize the current iteration of ETDFL, conveniently accessible within “The Frequencies of Rifing” publication, the author has gone a step further by crafting an advanced user version. This specialized edition not only facilitates the exploration of advanced research avenues but also serves as a valuable tool for clinicians engaged in employing rife frequencies within their professional practice. By offering this nuanced approach, the author enhances accessibility to frequency-based therapies, empowering users with the means to delve into more intricate aspects of this therapeutic modality.
—————————–
